
Don't bank on a sequel to the new Camaro.
So by now every blogger and their mother has covered the 5th Gen. Camaro. But not me, because I like to take my sweet time to provide you with the best I can. And because I’m lazy, but that’s beside the point. What matters is that the Camro is back, and at the worst possible time. It’s seven years too late, 300 pounds to heavy and not the car Chevy needs. The mileage, while not terrible for a 3700 pound V6 car, is nowhere near enough to meet the impending doom that is CAFE. And the V8 SS model will be lucky to average 20 MPG! But it’s a Camaro, so it will be a great car to own and drive, just not pay for. With dismal mileage and prices starting a few thousand dollars above the Mustang, don’t look for the Camaro to be the smash hit everyone wants it to be. That’s simply not possible.
Now none of this necessarily means that the Camaro is a bad car. In fact, I believe the exact opposite. With a thundering 420 horse SS model, and a not-to-shabby 300 from the V6 fitted to the LS and LT spec, the Camaro is a performance bargain, as it should be. Chevy does produce the car that defines ‘bang for your buck,’ the Corvette, so the fact that the Camaro follows this up is fitting.
The new Camaro should have immediately followed the 2003 model. It would have pre-dated the Mustang, and been the first to “go retro” in the styling department. But, alas, it is coming nearly 7 years too late, and a car that could be very swuccessful under the right circumstances should not be released right now, becasue GM is banking too much on it, and the odds are stacked against the 2010 Camaro. We’ll just have to wait and see who’s right.